|
Equipment:
Spectrophotometers: GretagMacbeth’s i1 Pro/iO and iCColor 210
Profiling Software: GretagMacbeth’s ProfileMaker Pro 5 (PM Pro)
The i1 Pro and the iCColor are paired to
a serialized calibration tile. They both use their calibration tile to perform
a self-initialization test at start-up and self-calibration tests prior to
measuring each target and during the target measuring process to
assure each measurement is accurate. If the spectrophotometer does not
pass any self-test the software will not measure a target. If a self-test
performed during the target measuring process is failed none of the measurements
can be used to make a profile. The manufacturer
requires each spectrophotometer be serviced and calibrated by a certified
technician at regular intervals. I maintain my spectrophotometers as
recommended by the manufacturer.
The i1Pro/iO and iCColor are equally
accurate and both are semi-automatic. Once the target each page of the
target has been properly positioned in or on the spectrophotometer the patches
are automatically measured. After all the pages of the target have been
measured I am given the choice of making a profile or saving the measurement
data. I save the measurement data, so I can use it to make multiple profiles and
also the date will be available later for troubleshooting purposes if you are
not satisfied with the results you achieve with your profile. The
differences between the i1Pro/iO and iCColor are:
1. The i1Pro/iO is an X-Y table
with a hand-held i1 Pro in the arm. It is more flexible
than a strip reader, it can measure a wider variety of media as well as
a wider variety of target sizes than a strip reader such as the iCColor
210.
The i1 Pro can also be removed and used as a hand-held device to measure and calibrate
monitors and transmissive targets and the ambient lighting in an area.
2.
The iCColor 210 is a strip reader. The target is fed into a slot in the front
(similar to feeding a document into a fax machine) the target is measured and comes back
out the same slot. The iCColor requires less skill to operate and takes
minimal space on a desk.
Workflow:
When using the iCColor the target is
trimmed on the dotted lines and fed into the spectrophotometer. The solid dark
bars at either end of the target are alignment bars used by the software to
properly align the target and locate each individual patch. Each patch is
measured a
minimum of three times and the measurements are averaged together. The iCColor
takes the measurements against a neutral measurement plate to assure the color of the media
as well as
light color patches of the target are
accurately measured.
When using the i1Pro/iO the target page is
placed on the surface of an X-Y table and held there by static-electricity.
3 of the 4 corners of each page of the target are manually identified for the
software and the software is started. The software automatically measures
the page, each patch is measured a minimum of 3 times and the measurements are
averaged together. The iO X-Y table has a neutral measurement surface that
assures an accurate measurement of the color of the media as well as all the
light colored patches of the target are accurately measured.
|
Profile Variation Information:
None of the profile variations is best for every
image. Just like choosing a Rendering Intent, the best
way to decide which profile variation will provide the
best results when printing a image is to print the image
with all 3 profile variations and compare the results.
In fact using the 3 different profile variations should
provide differences quite similar to using a different
Rendering Intent when printing an image with the same
profile (don't forget to test each profile variation
using the each of the available Rendering Intents). General
guidelines are:
Colorful: Try this
profile variation first. It is the newest gamut
mapping variation of the profiling software, it provides
the largest gamut with well
saturated, clean primary colors. It is a good first
choice.
(ProfileMaker Pro definition: Provides maximum color
saturations and particularly clean primary colors.)
If you find that you are
losing detail try the Chroma variation of your
profile.
Chroma: This profile
variation was the gamut mapping variation for the
previous version of the profiling software (ProfileMaker
Pro 4.x). The publisher only left it in the
software for those users who wanted to make profiles to
match older profiles. However, it has proven to
provide better results than the Colorful variation in
certain situations. This profile variation has a large gamut while minimizing the
loss of details.
(ProfileMaker Pro definition: Places emphasis on higher
chroma in color reproduction, while keeping detail
losses to a minimum. The definition of "Chroma" is: the
aspect of color in the Munsell color system by which a
sample appears to differ from a gray of the same
lightness or brightness and that corresponds to
saturation of the perceived color.)
If you find that you are losing
shadow detail try the Classic variation of your
profile.
Classic: This profile
variation was the gamut mapping variation for the
version of the profiling software that is two releases
old (ProfileMaker Pro 3.x). The publisher only
left it in the software for those users who wanted to
make profiles to match older profiles. However, it
has proven to provide better results than the either the
Colorful or the Chroma variations in certain situations. This profile
variation is useful if it is more important for you to
be able to print more shadow details than it is for you
to be able to use the largest possible number of colors
your printer is capable of creating. I have
received reports from users that primarily print
landscapes and nature scenes who say this is the
variation that provides the best results for their work.
(ProfileMaker Pro
definition: Places heavy emphasis on lightness
reproduction and preserving detail in the entire color
space.) If you find the number of colors you are able to
print is too few try using either the Colorful or
Chroma variation of your profile.
Remember it is
important to TEST each variation of your profiles by
both soft proofing and by making reasonably sized test
prints to determine what combination of profile
variation and Rendering Intent will provide the best
results for your images and workflow. The same
combination may not provide the best results on for
every image. |
|